The U.S. Department of Education urged states and districts on February 9, 2026, to use existing federal formula funds for strategic staffing models that replace the one-teacher, one-classroom setup with teams of educators sharing responsibility for the same students. The guidance came in a Dear Colleague Letter focused on Title II, Part A, the main federal stream for educator quality, per the department's announcement.
The letter matters for budget planning because it requires no new money and no new application. It tells local leaders they may redirect dollars they already receive toward redesigned roles aimed at filling vacancies and raising achievement.
What can Title II funds pay for?
Under the guidance, Title II, Part A dollars can support differentiated roles and compensation, including incentive pay for teachers who take on coaching or team-leadership duties. The funds may also cover induction and mentoring for novice teachers, educator pipelines such as residencies, apprenticeships, and Grow Your Own programs, job-embedded professional learning, and school leader development.
Title I funds can supplement these activities in schools operating schoolwide programs, the department noted.
What is strategic staffing?
Strategic staffing is a team-based design in which at least two educators share responsibility for the same group of students during the same time blocks. Assistant Secretary Kirsten Baesler, quoted in the release, called strategic staffing an innovative solution for implementing thoughtful designs to improve academic achievement.
Why is the department acting now?
Vacancy data continue to show tens of thousands of unfilled teaching positions nationally, and several states have begun pilotting team-based models as a retention tool. The letter signals federal permission to spend formula dollars on those designs without seeking waivers.
District leaders will still need to check supplement-not-supplant rules, but the guidance gives finance teams a clear federal endorsement for budgeting Title II dollars toward new staffing structures in the 2026-27 cycle.
What does the research say about team-based models?
Strategic staffing grew out of opportunity culture and team-teaching pilots in districts across the South and Midwest, where evaluations found benefits for novice teacher retention when new educators begin in supported roles rather than solo classrooms. The federal letter does not cite specific studies, and district results have varied with implementation quality.
How could districts put the letter to use?
Common first steps include redesigning a grade-level team so a veteran teacher leads planning while a newer teacher co-delivers instruction, adding stipends for teacher-leaders out of Title II, and contracting with a residency partner to feed the pipeline. Because the letter covers induction and mentoring, districts can also fund instructional coaches for schools with the highest turnover.
Union sign-off remains a practical gate. Where differentiated pay and shared responsibility change working conditions, districts have generally negotiated memoranda of understanding before shifting schedule and salary structures.
Does more guidance follow?
The department signaled that further technical assistance on allowable uses is available through its program offices, and state education agencies are expected to reference the letter in consolidated plan updates submitted during 2026.
For more context, read How State Cellphone Ban Laws Actually Work in K-12 Schools.
For more context, read The FAFSA Overhaul Is Done. The Cleanup Is Not.
For more context, read student loan interest rate reduction.